New players need to be extremely careful - there are a lot of people in this game who very confidently give out lots of bad advice. This post being downvoted just shows how many people never actually look at the numbers and prefer to just recycle outdated advice. 5th place on a list of 9 puts it in the bottom half, making it - like I said - one of the least efficient fps gbs in the game. But I’ll grant that this is difficult to quantify with exact numbers.Įven if you count cdm/ao as fps buildings and ignore gbg entirely though, and even if you completely ignore the happiness penalty that will crush any new player, and even if you ignore the secondary benefits of the other buildings, that still puts Inno in 5th place overall. Also combat boosts give more fps than fps boosts these days, due to gbg - once you factor that in, they’re probably cheaper than Inno also. Inno is cheaper than CdM / AO for sure, but those are combat buildings that give fps, not fps buildings. And you usually need to level HS to support Inno anyway, so it doesn’t even count. Cape is much cheaper, much smaller, and no happiness penalty.Īs far as pure fps producers go, Inno is better than.HS. HC, CC, SC, and very often BG are cheaper to level, and all of them have a very useful secondary benefit except Cape. If you only look at gbs that existed back when Inno first came out, Inno is amazing!īut if you compare it to buildings available today, Inno is not amazing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |